![]() Your codes about the style of section gives me a very good example to learn TeXmacs further. Besides, I said “I thought TeXmacs and LaTeX should render out same equations.” means “I used to think, but now I don’t.”Īnyway, besides those words defending myself, I want to say thank you for your help. Then that’s it! I think you did more: you want to show how wrong I was to have this question even asked, which I think isn’t good. Maybe my question 1 is controversial, I thought it’s a bug, you say no. ![]() So there’s no need to be sensitive and allergic to those words about LaTeX. I had never ever imply that TeXmacs is a follower of TeX/LaTeX to undermine the value of this software. Unfortunately, my examples just come from LaTeX, since there’s not many popular typesetting tools and they do have many similarities to compare. x2y and compose both inline and new line equations (numbered) both using a. There’s no way to expose your intention better than giving examples. To make equation authoring easier, the equation editor is in math mode by. ![]() I always use LaTeX as an example because I want to address my problem efficiently and precisely. So what I ask for today is readability, method and convenience of method. ![]() LaTeX would thereby comment out the end of math mode (e.g. #NEWLINE IN MATHMOD PLUS#I agree what you said “Typography matters about readibility and visually pleasant arrangements.” and I plus one more: convenience. In inline mode, KaTeX allows line breaks after outermost relations (like or. I never say TeXmacs should be a pixel-by-pixel/feature-by-feature substitute of TeX/LaTeX. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |